Already a Member? | Contact Us | Help
  1.   
  2.   
  3.   
  4.   
  5.   
  6. Free with membership
  7. Traveler Tote Bag
  8. Silver-and-Black Book Light
  9. SPECIAL OFFER!
     GET A BONUS BOOK NOW!
    Have less to buy later! Buy one more book on sale now for 50% off the publisher's edition price!
  10.  

Click to remove from cart.

  

Subtotal: $0.00

Your Total Savings: $0.00
God's Battalions By Rodney Stark

God's Battalions

The Case for the Crusades

by Rodney Stark

Mem. Ed. $17.49

Pub. Ed. $24.99

You pay $0.20

God's Battalions

In his famous speech at Claremont on October 27, 1095, Pope Urban II graphically detailed the torture, rape and murder of Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land and the defilement of churches and holy places committed by the Turks. He then asked followers of Christ to become “soldiers of the living God” and go to war; the next year a Christian army set out for Jerusalem and the First Crusade was underway. Yet according to Rodney Stark, most scholars now seem to regard the Crusades as nothing more than the case of an expansionist, imperialistic Christendom brutalizing, looting and colonizing a tolerant and peaceful Islam. Stark takes issue with virtually every aspect of what he calls this “prevailing wisdom” in God’s Battalions.

Stark begins his history of the Crusades not with the pope’s speech at Claremont, but with the rise of Islam and the onset of the Muslim invasions of Christendom in the seventh century, when Islamic armies swept over the larger portion of what was then Christian territory, including the Middle East, Egypt and all of North Africa, Spain, southern Italy and numerous Mediterranean islands including Sicily, Corsica, Cyprus, Rhodes, Crete, Malta and Sardinia. And having thus ruthlessly conquered, Stark maintains that the Muslims were also brutal and intolerant rulers. Christian retaliation was inevitable.

Having thus set the stage, Stark gives a detailed history of the First Crusade, following the Christian army though the sieges of Nicaea and Antioch in 1097 to the siege and conquest of Jerusalem in 1099. He tells the history of the Crusaders’ kingdoms subsequently established by the First Crusade and the history of the four Crusades that followed. And he describes the founding of the two knightly religious orders of military monks—the Templars and the Hospitallers—dedicated to defending the Holy Land.

Throughout God’s Battalions, Stark attempts to debunk claims of Muslim technological and cultural superiority to Christendom. He also rejects the notion that the Dark Ages in Europe were in fact dark, arguing that during that time Europe actually began the technological leap forward that would put it far ahead of the rest of the world. Little wonder, Stark argues, that the Crusaders were able to march more than twenty-five hundred miles, defeat an enemy that vastly outnumbered them and continue to do so as long as Europe was prepared to support the fight.

Ultimately this provocative reassessment of the Crusades asserts that the Crusades were precipitated—perhaps even justified—by centuries of Islamic aggression and atrocities, and that the Crusaders themselves were not barbarians who victimized cultivated Muslims in search of land, loot and converts, but men of faith who “sincerely believed they served in God’s battalions.”

Hardcover : 288 pages

Publisher: Harper Collins Publishers ( October 13, 2009 )

Item #: 12-774114

ISBN: 9780061582615

Product Dimensions: 6.0 x 9.0 x 0.68inches

Product Weight: 14.0 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)

A Needed Counterweight
November 09, 2011

Not a particularly well written book and rather choppy, but Stark capably reminds people of the intial Muslim aggression that swept Christianity from the lands around the Mediterrean and into Europe before being repulsed. The Byzantines are both victims and aggressors, wanting help from the West with the Muslims but wary of their presence in their realms. A key point is that the Crusaders had made no plans to stay and occupy the Holy Land, as they assumed the Byzantines would take charge there. When they did not, the Crusaders stayed.

Reviewer: Maccduff

Research Paper
March 04, 2011

More like a research paper than a book. Each chapter begins with a thesis, has the body, and end with a conclusion. The problem is the author appears to have made his conclusions before doing the research which leads the reader to question those conclusions. With that said, the book is worth reading and brings forth many points that are not well known.

Reviewer: Raymond S

Unnecessarily reactionary
October 29, 2010

Stark's lack of understanding of Byzantine regional politics, and obvious western Christian bias against them, tarnishes what could have been a better read. The Christian Byzantines might well have been their best allies, had not the Crusaders repeatedly tromped through Byzantine lands pillaging and demanding material support and obeisance at every turn, while willfully ignoring their reluctant host's insider knowledge of their close neighbors. In the end, the Crusader sack of Constantinople forever weakened the Eastern Empire, destroying their ability to resist the tide of Islam, and any desire or means to aid the Crusader states. While there is a need for popular books that address the imbalance in current views of the Crusades, this one was unnecessarily reactionary.

Reviewer: John E

Well referenced
August 13, 2010

This book is well referenced and as such difficult for PC types to refute without their using ad hominem comments. Stark presents a stark (bad pun) view of how the Crusades were a response to, not a cause of, Islamic warfare and other violence. As with the best of history books, it has the reader applying its lessons to the world of today.

Reviewer: Edward P

Sorry to disagree
April 24, 2010

To begin with, Stark is a sociologist not an historian. His take on his subject and his methodology are going to be different from the start. Having studied the Crusades since college and keeping abreast of current scholarship I have to take exception to many of his propositions. The book has a fatal flaw at the very beginning. His view of the crusades is limited to the Holy Land with out any serious reference to Spain or the Baltic Crusades let alone movements like the Albigensian Crusade. This allows him to make statements that a fuller picture would discredit. Modern scholarship overcame that problem decades ago. He also fails to incorporate the wider history of medieval Europe into his story. This is a major omission. There is little interaction with the problem of the Crusades' impact on Eastern Christianity. This is equally as important as relations with Islam. His attack on modern scholarship is a straw man. He presents the most extreme opposite view of crusade studies as possible in order to make his own views appear moderate and even handed. Anyone who has read modern studies of the crusdaes can immediately see this fact at work. Actually, based on his other works, it is apparent that Stark has anointed himself as the modern apologist for Christianity. As any student of apologetics knows, the apologist must paint his opponent in the darkest colors possible to more easily defend his own position. Stark is not attacking PC history. He is creating his own new PC version acceptable to those who want to believe certain ideas and perspectives that history has denied them in the past. Yet Stark is doing a service to historigraphy. His unbalanced views will force better historians to correct his errors and save the crusades from the new PC version.

Reviewer: John V

Contributors

Get Connected:
Paypal Logo McAfee SECURE sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams
09P
13303201201I3MK